Battle of Rorke’s Drift
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|Battle of Rorke’s Drift|
|Part of the Anglo-Zulu War|
The Defence of Rorke’s Drift, by Alphonse de Neuville (1880)
|United Kingdom||Zulu Kingdom|
|Commanders and leaders|
|Lt. John Chard |
Lt. Gonville Bromhead
|Prince Dabulamanzi kaMpande|
|139–141 British Army regulars|
11 colonial troops
4 civilians   
100 NNH cavalry
(briefly engaged, then fled)
3,000–4,000 Zulus: 
|Casualties and losses|
|17 killed  |
|351 confirmed killed  |
about 500 wounded 
The Battle of Rorke’s Drift, also known as the Defence of Rorke’s Drift, was a battle in the Anglo-Zulu War . The defence of the mission station of Rorke’s Drift, under the command of Lieutenants John Chard of the Royal Engineers and Gonville Bromhead , immediately followed the British Army ‘s defeat at the Battle of Isandlwana on 22 January 1879, and continued into the following day.
Just over 150 British and colonial troops successfully defended the garrison against an intense assault by 3,000 to 4,000 Zulu warriors . The massive but piecemeal  Zulu attacks on Rorke’s Drift came very close to defeating the much smaller garrison, but were ultimately repelled. Eleven Victoria Crosses were awarded to the defenders, along with a number of other decorations and honours.
- 1 Prelude
- 1.1 Defensive preparations
- 2 Battle
- 2.1 Defence of the hospital
- 2.2 The cattle kraal and the bastion
- 3 Aftermath
- 4 Victoria Crosses and Distinguished Conduct Medals
- 5 Depictions and dramatisations
- 6 See also
- 7 Notes
- 8 References
- 9 External links
Prelude[ edit ]
Rorke’s Drift, known as kwaJimu  (“Jim’s Land”) in the Zulu language , was a mission station and the former trading post of James Rorke, an Irish merchant. It was located near a drift, or ford , on the Buffalo (Mzinyathi) River, which at the time formed the border between the British colony of Natal and the Zulu Kingdom . On 9 January 1879, the British No. 3 (Centre) Column, under Lord Chelmsford , arrived and encamped at the drift.
On 11 January, the day after the British ultimatum to the Zulus expired, the column crossed the river and encamped on the Zulu bank. A small force consisting of B Company, 2nd Battalion, 24th (2nd Warwickshire) Regiment of Foot (2nd/24th) under Lieutenant Gonville Bromhead was detailed to garrison the post, which had been turned into a supply depot and hospital under the overall command of Brevet Major Henry Spalding, 104th Foot , a member of Chelmsford’s staff.
On 20 January, after reconnaissance patrolling and building of a track for its wagons, Chelmsford’s column marched to Isandlwana, approximately 6 miles (9.7 km) to the east, leaving behind the small garrison. A large company of the 2nd/3rd Natal Native Contingent (NNC) under Captain William Stevenson was ordered to remain at the post to strengthen the garrison.  This company numbered between 100 and 350 men. 
Captain Thomas Rainforth’s G Company of the 1st/24th Foot was ordered to move up from its station at Helpmekaar, 10 miles (16 km) to the southeast, after its own relief arrived, to further reinforce the position.  Later that evening a portion of the No. 2 Column under Brevet Colonel Anthony Durnford , late of the Royal Engineers , arrived at the drift and camped on the Zulu bank, where it remained through the next day.
Late on the evening of 21 January, Durnford was ordered to Isandlwana, as was a small detachment of No. 5 Field Company, Royal Engineers , commanded by Lieutenant John Chard , which had arrived on the 19th to repair the pontoons that bridged the Buffalo. Chard rode ahead of his detachment to Isandlwana on the morning of 22 January to clarify his orders, but was sent back to Rorke’s Drift with only his wagon and its driver to construct defensive positions for the expected reinforcement company, passing Durnford’s column en route in the opposite direction.
Sometime around noon on the 22nd, Major Spalding left the station for Helpmekaar to ascertain the whereabouts of Rainforth’s G Company, which was now overdue. He left Chard in temporary command. Chard rode down to the drift itself where the engineers’ camp was located. Soon thereafter, two survivors from Isandlwana – Lieutenant Gert Adendorff of the 1st/3rd NNC and a trooper from the Natal Carbineers – arrived bearing the news of the defeat and that a part of the Zulu impi was approaching the station.
Upon hearing this news, Chard, Bromhead, and another of the station’s officers, Acting Assistant Commissary James Dalton (of the Commissariat and Transport Department ), held a quick meeting to decide the best course of action – whether to attempt a retreat to Helpmekaar or to defend their current position. Dalton pointed out that a small column, travelling in open country and burdened with carts full of hospital patients, would be easily overtaken and defeated by a numerically superior Zulu force, and so it was soon agreed that the only acceptable course was to remain and fight. 
Defensive preparations[ edit ]
Once the British officers decided to stay, Chard and Bromhead directed their men to make preparations to defend the station. With the garrison’s some 400 men  working quickly, a defensive perimeter was constructed out of mealie bags. This perimeter incorporated the storehouse, the hospital, and a stout stone kraal . The buildings were fortified, with loopholes (firing holes) knocked through the external walls and the external doors barricaded with furniture.
At about 3:30 pm, a mixed troop of about 100 Natal Native Horse (NNH) under Lieutenant Alfred Henderson arrived at the station after having retreated in good order from Isandlwana. They volunteered to picket the far side of the Oscarberg (Shiyane), the large hill that overlooked the station and from behind which the Zulus were expected to approach. 
Prince Dabulamanzi kaMpande
With the defences nearing completion and battle approaching, Chard had several hundred men available to him: Bromhead’s B Company, Stevenson’s large NNC company, Henderson’s NNH troop, and various others (most of them hospital patients, but ‘walking wounded’) drawn from various British and colonial units. Adendorff also stayed, while the trooper who had ridden in with him galloped on to warn the garrison at Helpmekaar. 
The force was sufficient, in Chard’s estimation, to fend off the Zulus. Chard posted the British soldiers around the perimeter, adding some of the more able patients, the ‘casuals’ and civilians, and those of the NNC who possessed firearms along the barricade. The rest of the NNC, armed only with spears, were posted outside the mealie bag and biscuit box barricade within the stone-walled cattle kraal. 
The approaching Zulu force was vastly larger; the uDloko , uThulwana , inDlondo amabutho (regiments) of married men aged in their 30s and 40s and the inDlu-yengwe ibutho of young unmarried men mustered 3,000 to 4,000 warriors, none of them engaged during the battle at Isandlwana.  This Zulu force was the ‘loins’ or reserve of the army at Isandlwana and is often referred to as the Undi Corps . It was directed to swing wide of the British left flank and pass west and south of Isandlwana hill itself, in order to position itself across the line of communication and retreat of the British and their colonial allies in order to prevent their escape back into Natal by way of the Buffalo River ford leading to Rorke’s Drift.
By the time the Undi Corps reached Rorke’s Drift at 4:30 pm, they had fast-marched some 20 miles (32 km) from the morning encampment they had left at around 8 am, and they would spend almost the next eleven and a half hours continuously storming the British fortifications at Rorke’s Drift.
Most Zulu warriors were armed with an assegai (short spear) and a shield made of cowhide.  The Zulu army drilled in the personal and tactical use and coordination of this weapon. Some Zulus also had old muskets and antiquated rifles, though their marksmanship training was poor, and the quality and supply of powder and shot was dreadful. 
Historical picture of Zulu warriors from about the same time as the events at Rorke’s Drift
The Zulu attitude towards firearms was that: “The generality of Zulu warriors, however, would not have firearms – the arms of a coward, as they said, for they enable the poltroon to kill the brave without awaiting his attack.”  Even though their fire was not accurate, it was responsible for five of the seventeen British deaths at Rorke’s Drift.  
While the Undi Corps had been led by inkhosi kaMapitha at the Isandlwana battle, the command of the Undi Corps passed to Prince Dabulamanzi kaMpande (half-brother of Cetshwayo kaMpande , the Zulu king) when kaMapitha was wounded during the pursuit of British fugitives from Isandlwana. Prince Dabulamanzi was considered rash and aggressive, and this characterisation was borne out by his violation of King Cetshwayo’s order to act only in defence of Zululand against the invading British soldiers and not carry the war over the border into enemy territory.  The Rorke’s Drift attack was an unplanned raid rather than any organised counter-invasion, with many of the Undi Corps Zulus breaking off to raid other African kraals and homesteads while the main body advanced on Rorke’s Drift.
At about 4:00 pm, Surgeon James Reynolds , Otto Witt – the Swedish missionary who ran the mission at Rorke’s Drift – and army chaplain Reverend George Smith came down from the Oscarberg hillside with the news that a body of Zulus was fording the river to the southeast and was “no more than five minutes away”. At this point, Witt decided to depart the station, as his family lived in an isolated farmhouse about 30 kilometres (19 mi) away, and he wanted to be with them. Witt’s native servant, Umkwelnantaba, left with him; so too did one of the hospital patients, Lieutenant Thomas Purvis of the 1st/3rd NNC.
Battle[ edit ]
This section needs additional citations for verification . Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources . Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (October 2010) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message )
Contemporary drawing of Rorke’s Drift Post, from The History of the Corps of Royal Engineers. 
The Defence of Rorke’s Drift by Lady Butler (1880). Among those depicted are Lieutenants John Chard and Gonville Bromhead (centre) commanding the battle, behind them Padre George Smith handing out ammunition from his hat, Private Frederick Hitch (right, standing) handing out ammunition while wounded, and Surgeon James Henry Reynolds and Storekeeper Byrne tending to the wounded Corporal Scammell (Reynolds kneeling; Byrne falling, shot). Possibly Corporal Ferdinand Schiess is shown at centre background at the barricade just to left of Chard and Bromhead in NNC uniform – face not shown.
At about 4:20 pm, the battle began with Lieutenant Henderson’s NNH troopers, stationed behind the Oscarberg, briefly engaging the vanguard of the main Zulu force.  However, tired from the battle at Isandlwana and retreat to Rorke’s Drift as well as being short of carbine ammunition, Henderson’s men departed for Helpmekaar. Henderson himself reported to Lieutenant Chard the enemy were close and that “his men would not obey his orders but were going off to Helpmekaar”. 
Henderson then followed his departing men. Upon witnessing the withdrawal of Henderson’s NNH troop, Captain Stevenson’s NNC company abandoned the cattle kraal and fled, greatly reducing the strength of the defending garrison.  Outraged that Stevenson and some of his colonial NCOs  also fled from the barricades, a few British soldiers fired after them, killing Corporal William Anderson.
With the Zulus nearly at the station, the garrison now numbered between 154 and 156 men.  Of these, only Bromhead’s company could be considered a cohesive unit. Additionally, up to 39 of his company were at the station as hospital patients, although only a handful of these were unable to take up arms.  With fewer men, Chard realised the need to modify the defences, and gave orders that biscuit boxes be used to construct a wall through the middle of the post in order to make possible the abandonment of the hospital side of the station if the need arose. 
At 4:30 pm, the Zulus rounded the Oscarberg and approached the south wall. Private Frederick Hitch , posted as lookout atop the storehouse, reported a large column of Zulus approaching. The Zulu vanguard, 600 men of the iNdluyengwe, attacked the south wall, which joined the hospital and the storehouse. The British opened fire when the Zulus were 500 yards (460 m) away.
The majority of the attacking Zulu force swept around to attack the north wall, while a few took cover and were either pinned down by continuing British fire or retreated to the terraces of Oscarberg. There they began a harassing fire of their own. As this occurred, another Zulu force swept on to the hospital and northwestern wall.
Those British on the barricades — including Dalton and Bromhead — were soon engaged in fierce hand-to-hand fighting . The British wall was too high for the Zulus to scale, so they resorted to crouching under the wall, trying to get hold of the defenders’ Martini–Henry rifles, slashing at British soldiers with assegais or firing their weapons through the wall. At places, they clambered over each other’s bodies to drive the British off the walls but were driven back.
Zulu fire, both from those under the wall and around the Oscarberg, inflicted a few casualties, and five of the seventeen defenders who were killed or mortally wounded in the action were struck while at the north wall.
Defence of the hospital[ edit ]
Chard realised that the north wall, under near constant Zulu attack, could not be held. At 6:00 pm, he pulled his men back into the yard, abandoning the front two rooms of the hospital in the process. The hospital was becoming untenable; as the loopholes had become a liability: rifles poking out were grabbed at by the Zulus, yet if the holes were left empty, the Zulu warriors stuck their own weapons through in order to fire into the rooms. Among the soldiers assigned to the hospital were Corporal William Wilson Allen and Privates Cole, Dunbar, Hitch, Horrigan, John Williams , Joseph Williams, Alfred Henry Hook , Robert Jones , and William Jones .
Privates Horrigan, John Williams, Joseph Williams and other patients tried to hold the hospital entrance with rifles and fixed bayonets. Joseph Williams defended a small window, and 14 dead Zulus were later found beneath that window. As it became clear the front of the building was being taken over by Zulus, John Williams began to hack a way of escape through the wall dividing the central room and a corner room in the back of the hospital. As he made a passable breach, the door into the central room came under furious attack from the Zulus, and he only had time to drag two bedridden patients out before the door gave way.
The corner room that John Williams had pulled the two patients into was occupied by Private Hook and another nine patients. John Williams hacked at the wall to the next room with his pick-axe, as Hook held off the Zulus. A firefight erupted as the Zulus fired through the door and Hook returned fire – but not without an assegai striking his helmet and stunning him. 
Williams made the hole big enough to get into the next room, which was occupied only by patient Private Waters, and dragged the patients through. The last man out was Hook, who killed some Zulus who had knocked down the door before he dived through the hole. John Williams once again went to work, spurred on by the fact that the roof was now ablaze, as Hook defended the hole and Waters continued to fire through a loophole.
After fifty minutes, the hole was large enough to drag the patients through, and the men– save Privates Waters and Beckett, who hid in the wardrobe (Waters was wounded and Beckett died of assegai wounds)– were now in the last room, being defended by Privates Robert Jones and William Jones. From here, the patients clambered out through a window and then made their way across the yard to the barricade.
Of the eleven patients, nine survived the trip to the barricade, as did all the able-bodied men. According to James Henry Reynolds , only four defenders were killed in the hospital: one was a member of the Natal Native Contingent with a broken leg; Sergeant Maxfield and Private Jenkins, who were ill with fever and refused to be moved were also killed. Reportedly, Jenkins was killed after being seized and stabbed, together with Private Adams who also refused to move. Private Cole, assigned to the hospital, was killed when he ran outside. Another hospital patient killed was Trooper Hunter of the Natal Mounted Police.  Among the hospital patients who escaped were a Corporal Mayer of the NNC; Bombardier Lewis of the Royal Artillery, and Trooper Green of the Natal Mounted Police, who was wounded in the thigh by a spent bullet. Private Conley with a broken leg was pulled to safety by Hook, although Conley’s leg was broken again in the process. 
The cattle kraal and the bastion[ edit ]
The evacuation of the burning hospital completed the shortening of the perimeter. As night fell, the Zulu attacks grew stronger. The cattle kraal came under renewed assault and was evacuated by 10:00 pm, leaving the remaining men in a small bastion around the storehouse. Throughout the night, the Zulus kept up a constant assault against the British positions; Zulu attacks only began to slacken after midnight, and they finally ended by 2:00 am, being replaced by a constant harassing fire from Zulu firearms until 4:00 am.[ citation needed ]
By that time, the garrison had suffered fourteen dead. Two others were mortally wounded and eight more – including Dalton – were seriously wounded. Almost every man had some kind of wound. They were all exhausted, having fought for the better part of ten hours and were running low on ammunition. Of 20,000 rounds in reserve at the mission, only 900 remained. 
Aftermath[ edit ]
As dawn broke, the British could see that the Zulus were gone; all that remained were the dead and severely wounded.  Patrols were dispatched to scout the battlefield, recover rifles, and look for survivors, many of whom were killed
when found. At roughly 7:00 am, an Impi of Zulus suddenly appeared, and the British manned their positions again.
No attack materialised however, as the Zulus had been on the move for six days prior to the battle and had not eaten properly for two. In their ranks were hundreds of wounded, and they were several days’ march from any supplies. Soon after their appearance, the Zulus left the way they had come.[ citation needed ]
Around 8:00 am, another force appeared, and the redcoats left their breakfast to man their positions again. However, the force turned out to be the vanguard of Lord Chelmsford ‘s relief column.
Breakdown of British and colonial casualties: 
- 1st/24th Foot: 4 killed or mortally wounded in action; 2 wounded
- 2nd/24th Foot: 9 killed or mortally wounded in action; 9 wounded
- Commissariat and Transport Department : 1 killed in action; 1 wounded
- Natal Mounted Police : 1 killed in action; 1 wounded
- 1st/3rd NNC: 1 killed in action
- 2nd/3rd NNC: 1 killed  2 wounded
After the battle 351 Zulu bodies were counted, but it has been estimated that at least 500 wounded and captured Zulus might have been massacred as well.   Having witnessed the carnage at Isandlwana , the members of Chelmsford’s relief force had no mercy for the captured, wounded Zulus they came across.  Nor did the station’s defenders. Trooper William James Clarke of the Natal Mounted Police described in his diary that “altogether we buried 375 Zulus and some wounded were thrown into the grave. Seeing the manner in which our wounded had been mutilated after being dragged from the hospital … we were very bitter and did not spare wounded Zulus”.  Laband, in his book The Zulu Response to the British Invasion of 1879, accepts the estimate of 600 that Shepstone had from the Zulus. 
Samuel Pitt, who served as a private in B Company during the battle, told The Western Mail in 1914 that the official enemy death toll was too low: “We reckon we had accounted for 875, but the books will tell you 400 or 500”.    Lieutenant Horace Smith-Dorrien , a member of Chelmsford’s staff, wrote that the day after the battle an improvised gallows was used “for hanging Zulus who were supposed to have behaved treacherously”. 
Victoria Crosses and Distinguished Conduct Medals[ edit ]
John Chard VC, as a lieutenant-colonel
Eleven Victoria Crosses were awarded to the defenders of Rorke’s Drift, seven of them to soldiers of the 2nd/24th Foot – the most ever received for a single action by one regiment (although not, as commonly thought, the most awarded in a single action or the most in a day: sixteen were awarded for actions at the Battle of Inkerman , on 5 November 1854; twenty-eight were awarded as a result of the Second Relief of Lucknow , 14–22 November 1857). 
Four Distinguished Conduct Medals were also awarded. This high number of awards for bravery has been interpreted as a reaction to the earlier defeat at the Battle of Isandlwana – the extolling of the victory at Rorke’s Drift drawing the public’s attention away from the great defeat at Isandlwana and the fact that Lord Chelmsford and Henry Bartle Frere had instigated the war without the approval of Her Majesty’s Government. 
Certainly, Sir Garnet Wolseley , taking over as commander-in-chief from Lord Chelmsford later that year, was unimpressed with the awards made to the defenders of Rorke’s Drift, saying “it is monstrous making heroes of those who, shut up in buildings at Rorke’s Drift, could not bolt and fought like rats for their lives, which they could not otherwise save”.
Several historians have challenged this assertion and pointed out that the victory stands on its own merits, regardless of other concerns. Victor Davis Hanson responded to it directly in Carnage and Culture (also published as Why the West Has Won), saying, “Modern critics suggest such lavishness in commendation was designed to assuage the disaster at Isandhlwana and to reassure a skeptical Victorian public that the fighting ability of the British soldier remained unquestioned. Maybe, maybe not, but in the long annals of military history, it is difficult to find anything quite like Rorke’s Drift, where a beleaguered force, outnumbered forty to one, survived and killed twenty men for every defender lost”. 
Awarded the Victoria Cross: 
- Lieutenant John Rouse Merriott Chard , 5th Field Coy, Royal Engineers
- Lieutenant Gonville Bromhead ; B Coy, 2nd/24th Foot
- Corporal William Wilson Allen ; B Coy, 2nd/24th Foot
- Private Frederick Hitch ; B Coy, 2nd/24th Foot
- Private Alfred Henry Hook ; B Coy, 2nd/24th Foot
- Private Robert Jones ; B Coy, 2nd/24th Foot
- Private William Jones ; B Coy, 2nd/24th Foot
- Private John Williams ; B Coy, 2nd/24th Foot
- Surgeon-Major James Henry Reynolds ; Army Medical Department
- Acting Assistant Commissary James Langley Dalton ; Commissariat and Transport Department
- Corporal Christian Ferdinand Schiess ; 2nd/3rd Natal Native Contingent
In 1879 there was no provision for the posthumous granting of the Victoria Cross, and so it could not be awarded to anyone who had died in performing an act of bravery. In light of this, an unofficial “twelfth VC” may be added to those listed: Private Joseph Williams, B Coy, 2nd/24th Foot, who was killed during the fight in the hospital and for whom it was mentioned in despatches that “had he lived he would have been recommended for the Victoria Cross”. 
Awarded the Distinguished Conduct Medal: 
Sgt Frank Bourne, DCM, in 1905
- Gunner John Cantwell; N Batt, 5th Brig Royal Horse Artillery (demoted from bombardier wheeler the day before the battle)
- Private John William Roy; 1st/24th Foot
- Colour Sergeant Frank Edward Bourne ; B Coy, 2nd/24th Foot
- Second Corporal Francis Attwood; Army Service Corps
On 15 January 1880, a submission for a DCM was also made for Private Michael McMahon ( Army Hospital Corps ). The submission was cancelled on 29 January 1880 for absence without leave and theft. 
Depictions and dramatisations[ edit ]
The events surrounding the assault on Rorke’s Drift were first dramatised by military painters, notably Elizabeth Butler and Alphonse de Neuville . Their work was vastly popular in their day among the citizens of the British empire.
In 1914, a touring English Northern Union rugby league team defeated Australia 14–6 to win the Ashes in the final Test match . Depleted by injuries and fielding only ten men for much of the second half, the English outclassed and outfought the Australians in what quickly became known as the ‘ Rorke’s Drift Test ‘. 
In 1914, the Edison Company made a two-reel silent film titled Rorke’s Drift starring Richard Tucker .
The 1964 film Zulu produced by Stanley Baker is a depiction of the Battle of Rorke’s Drift.  The film received generally positive reviews from the critics. Some details of the film’s account are, however, historically inaccurate (for example, in the movie the regiment is called the South Wales Borderers but the unit was not in fact called that until two years after the battle, although the regiment had been based at Brecon in South Wales since 1873).  While most of the men of the 1st Battalion, 24th Regiment of Foot (1/24) were recruited from the industrial towns and agricultural classes of England, principally from Birmingham and adjacent southwest counties, only 10 soldiers of the 1/24 that fought in the battle were Welsh. Many of the soldiers of the junior battalion, the 2/24, were Welshmen.  Of the 122 soldiers of the 24th Regiment present at the Battle of Rorke’s Drift, 49 are known to have been of English nationality, 32 were Welsh, 16 were Irish, one was a Scot, and three were born overseas. The nationalities of the remaining 21 are unknown. 
In 1990 the game developer Impressions Games released a video game based on the historical battle. The battle was also featured by Mad Doc Software in its 2006 strategy game Empire Earth II : The Art of Supremacy as one of its “turning point” battle modes.
S. M. Stirling’s 2000 novel On the Oceans of Eternity depicts a battle between the small garrison force defending a Republic of Nantucket supply base and a massed force of Ringapi warriors; not only are the defensive tactics taken almost directly from Lt. Chard’s plan for the defense of Rorke’s Drift, but the battle itself later becomes known as “The Battle of O’Rourke’s Ford”.
The battle of Rorke’s Drift was given a chapter in military historian Victor Davis Hanson ‘s book Carnage and Culture (2002) as one of several landmark battles demonstrating the superior effectiveness of Western military practices. 
The sixth track of the Swedish heavy metal band Sabaton’s 2016 studio album The Last Stand , titled “Rorke’s Drift”, depicts the events of the battle. 
“The Tale of Isandhlwana and Rorke’s Drift” is an account written by H. Rider Haggard in True Story Book by Andrew Lang. While being a true account of the battle and naming many important figures, the writing omits Surgeon Reynolds, who played a crucial role in the defence. 
See also[ edit ]
- Rorke’s Drift Art and Craft Centre
- Military history of South Africa
Notes[ edit ]
- ^ Knight, Ian. Zulu: Isandlwana and Rorke’s Drift, 1992, pp. 107–108.
- ^ Holme, Norman. The Noble 24th, Savannah Publications,
ISBN 1-902366-04-2 , 1999, p. 265–369, 383.
- ^ Whybra 2004, pp. 68–69.
- ^ Estimates vary: Colenso 1880, p. 305, gives 3,000; Knight 2003, p. 37, gives “in excess of 3,000”; Lock and Quantrill 2005, pp. 231–232 gives 3,000, p. 231; Morris 1998 gives over 4,000.
- ^ Knight 1996, p. 23.
- ^ Porter 1889, p.33, “17 killed and 10 wounded.”. (including one killed by ‘friendly fire’ while fleeing the garrison at start of the battle)
- ^ Colenso 1880, p. 305
- ^ Lock and Quantrill 2005, excerpt from private journal of Lieutenant Colonel John North Crealock, Crealock states “351 dead were found and 500 wounded”.
- ^ Knight 2003, p. 37.
- ^ Morris, p. 168.
- ^ Knight 1996, p.23, “The post was guarded by one company of 2/24 … and a company of the NNC …”.
- ^ Estimates vary: Thompson 2006, p. 65, gives 100. Knight 1996, p. 27, gives 100 to 300. Knight, Ian. Greaves, Adrian, (ed.). Redcoats and Zulus, 2004, p. 116.
- ^ “Map” . Talana.co.za. Archived from the original on 17 March 2012. Retrieved 2012-11-09.
- ^ Knight 1996, p. 25.
- ^ Knight 1996, p. 28, “With 400 men to build them …”
- ^ Knight 1996, p.36.
- ^ a b c Morris 1998, p. 401
- ^ Morris 1998, p. 370, “played no part in the battle”
- ^ Archer, Christon I. World History of Warfare University of Nebraska Press, 2002, ISBN 0-8032-1941-5 , p.462 “They had a national army of twenty-five thousand men equipped with cowhide shields, assegais and clubs.” Lock and Quantrill 2005, p.62: John Shepstone, Acting Secretary for Native Affairs at the time, on the Zulu army – “Equipment: Each man carries his shield and assegais, and a kaross or blanket if he possesses one, he may also have a war dress of monkey skins or ox tails, this is all.”
- ^ Knight 1996, pp. 33, 38, 39.
- ^ Bourquin, S. Military History Journal, V.4, No.4, The Zulu military organization and the challenge of 1879, South African Military History Society, ISSN 0026-4016, Dec. 1978.
- ^ Bourquin, S. section ‘War of 1879’, subsection ‘Weapons’
- ^ Knight 1996, p. 38, “Although the Zulu position was a commanding one – a squad of good shots armed with efficient rifles could have made Chard’s position untenable within minutes – the Zulus were neither good shots, nor well armed.”
- ^ Knight 2003, p. 33.
- ^ a b Porter 1889, p. 31.
- ^ Knight 1996, p.36, and on p.88 this is described by Knight as “the first shots of the battle”.
- ^ Morris, p. 402. Chadwick, G.A. . Military History Journal, V.4, No.4, The Anglo-Zulu War of 1879, Isandlwana and Rorke’s Drift, South African Military History Society, ISSN 0026-4016, Jan. 1979. “This reduced the strength of the defenders drastically …”
- ^ Knight 1996, p.45, Corporal Scammell of the NNC is noted as remaining.
- ^ Whybra (2004) gives the most up-to-date analysis of the numbers present at the Battle of Rorke’s Drift. He counts 154 definite participants, with 2 others listed as “possibles”.
- ^ Whybra 2004, pp. 65–67.
- ^ Private Henry Hook’s account in The Royal Magazine 1905.
- ^ Wood, M.J. (2009). Leaders and Battles: The Art of Military Leadership . Random House Digital, Inc. p. 138.
- ^ Clammer, David (1973). The Zulu War . David & Charles. p. 111. ISBN 0-7153-5672-0 .
- ^ Machanik, Major (Dr) Felix. Military History Journal, V.4, No.6, Firepower and Firearms in the Zulu War of 1879, South African Military History Society, ISSN 0026-4016, Dec. 1979.
- ^ a b Private Henry Hook’s account in The Royal Magazine 1905. Also Colenso 1880 and Crealocke in Lock and Quantrill 2005.
- ^ Whybra 2004, pp. 62–64
- ^ Also, as mentioned, one member of Stevenson’s 2nd/3rd NNC, Corporal William Anderson, was killed by British fire while fleeing the station just prior to the arrival of the Zulus.
- ^ Lock and Quantrill 2005, p. 232, “… it is possible that all the Zulu wounded were put to death.”.
- ^ Thompson 2006, p.69
- ^ Lock and Quantrill 2005, pp. 231–232
- ^ Laband 1992, p. 108.
- ^ a b Lock and Quantrill 2005, p.232
- ^ Smith, David. Rorke’s Drift, The Guardian 21 April 2009, gives “about 400 Zulus” killed.
- ^ Carroll, Rory. Legendary Battle of Anglo-Zulu War marred by brutal aftermath, The Guardian 29 April 2003
- ^ “No. 24717” . The London Gazette . 2 May 1879. pp. 3177–3178.
- ^ Edward M. Spiers, The Scottish Soldier and Empire, 1854–1902, Edinburgh University Press, 2006, p. 41. ISBN 978-0-7486-2354-9 Also: Ian Knight, Zulu War, Osprey, 2004, p. 9, “By late 1878 Frere had manipulated a diplomatic crisis with the Zulus …” Colenso 1880, pp. 261–262, “the terms … are evidently such as he (Cetshwayo) may not improbably refuse, even at the risk of war … to preclude you from incurring the delay … involved in consulting Her Majesty’s Government upon a subject of so much importance as the terms …” Also: Ian Knight, Zulu War, Osprey, 2004, p. 11, “… an ultimatum with which, Frere knew, they could not possibly comply.”
- ^ Hanson, V. D. (2001). Why the West Has Won: Carnage and Culture from Salamis to Vietnam. London: Faber. p. 333. ISBN 9780571204175 .
- ^ Whybra 2004, pp. 71–72.
- ^ Snook 2006, pp. 96–99.
- ^ a b Whybra 2004, p. 72.
- ^ Kearney, L. H. (16 March 1940). “40,000 Cheered When Wagstaff’s 1914 Team Beat Australians With Eleven Men” . Sunday Mail (Brisbane) .
- ^ Dr. Saul David. “Zulu: The True Story” . British History in Depth, BBC. Retrieved 29 September 2011.
- ^ “The Royal Regiment of Wales” . Rrw.org.uk. Archived from the original on 23 March 2012. Retrieved 2012-11-09.
- ^ Lock and Quantrill 2005, p.37
- ^ Norman Holme (1999). The Noble 24th. p. 383.
- ^ Hanson, Victor Davis (2002). Carnage and Culture. Anchor. p. 279 et seq. ISBN 0-385-72038-6 .
- ^ Album review on totallytankered.com, retrieved on September 24.
- ^ “The Defence Of Rorke’s Drift”. The British Medical Journal. 1 (1729): 373–373. 1894. doi : 10.2307/20227493 . JSTOR 20227493 .
References[ edit ]
- Colenso, F.E. History of the Zulu War and Its Origin, London, 1880.
- Military Heritage discussed Rorke’s Drift and the politics of the Victoria Cross (Roy Morris Jr., Military Heritage, August 2005, Volume 7, No. 1, p. 8).
- Greaves, Adrian, Rorke’s Drift, Cassell, London, 2002.
- Laband, John (1992). Kingdom in Crisis: The Zulu Response to the British Invasion of 1879. Manchester University Press . ISBN 0-7190-3582-1 .
- Lock, Ron; Quantrill, Peter. Zulu Victory: The Epic of Isandlwana and the Cover-up. Greenhill Books. 2005, ISBN 1-85367-645-4 .
- Morris, Donald R. The Washing of the Spears: A History of the Rise of the Zulu Nation under Shaka and Its Fall in the Zulu War of 1879 Da Capo Press, 1998, ISBN 0-306-80866-8 .
- Knight, Ian, Rorke’s Drift 1879, “Pinned Like Rats in a Hole”; Osprey Campaign Series #41, Osprey Publishing 1996, ISBN 1-85532-506-3 .
- Knight, Ian, The Zulu War 1879, Osprey, 2003, ISBN 1-84176-612-7
- Porter, Whitworth (1889), “South African Wars, 1847–1885”, History of the Corps of Royal Engineers , II, London: Longmans, Green, and Co, pp. 24–43, retrieved 2008-08-14
- Snook, Lt Col Mike, Like Wolves on the Fold: The Defence of Rorke’s Drift. Greenhill Books, London, 2006. ISBN 1-85367-659-4 .
- Thompson, Paul Singer. Black soldiers of the queen: the Natal native contingent in the Anglo-Zulu War, University of Alabama Press, 2006, ISBN 0-8173-5368-2 .
- Whybra, Julian. England’s Sons, Gift Ltd., 2004.
- Sabaton orchestrated a song to commemorate these brave men in their 2016 album “The Last Stand”
External links[ edit ]
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Battle of Rorke’s Drift .|
- The Roll of those present at Rorke’s Drift 22/23 January, 1879
- Gilbert Padilla, “The Battle of Rorke’s Drift”
- Lt. Chard’s Map
- Catalogue description of papers relating to rewards for gallantry for Rorke’s Drift , The National Archives .
- The Battle of Rorke’s Drift
- Victorian wars Forum on Rorke’s Drift
- Conflicts in 1879
- Battles of the Anglo-Zulu War
- 1879 in the Colony of Natal
- History of KwaZulu-Natal
- South African heritage sites
- Last stand battles
- January 1879 events
- CS1: Julian–Gregorian uncertainty
- Use dmy dates from July 2013
- Pages using deprecated image syntax
- Coordinates on Wikidata
- Articles needing additional references from October 2010
- All articles needing additional references
- All articles with unsourced statements
- Articles with unsourced statements from November 2010
- Commons category link from Wikidata
- This page was last edited on 25 November 2018, at 11:26 (UTC).
- Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License ;
- About Wikipedia
- Contact Wikipedia
- Cookie statement
- Mobile view
- Skip to article
- Skip to navigation
Tuesday 04 December 2018
- TV and Radio
- Hay Festival
- Home »
- Culture »
Zulu: is this the greatest ever British war film?
Why has the Michael Caine epic depicting the Battle of Rorke’s Drift gripped
us for 50 years?
2:20PM GMT 23 Dec 2014
What’s so great about Zulu? To answer that question properly, you need to pass this test first. 1) Do you know Men of Harlech off by heart? 2) Can you name at least half of the 11 Victoria Cross winners in the film (by their nicknames where possible) without resorting to Google? 3) Have you ever found yourself stirred to ridiculous feelings of patriotism by John Barry’s magnificent film score on the morning commute?
I really hope someone else answers “yes” to all three, otherwise you can chalk me up as a lone madman.
Zulu – released 50 years ago this week – is a film about a glorious British myth. And that glorious myth goes like this: the Battle of Rorke’s Drift in 1879 was the British Empire’s finest hour – even finer, perhaps, than the Battle of Britain, 60 years later. Against all the odds, 150 British and colonial soldiers (about 40 of them hospital patients) fought off a fearsome army of 4,000 Zulu warriors. To the Victorians, it confirmed their every prejudice: brave British underdogs in red tunics had triumphed over terrifying African savages, whose women didn’t even cover their breasts!
Men of Harlech – the song belted out by our heroes during the film’s climax – evokes similar themes of battle. “Hark! I hear the foe advancing,” it goes. Yes, that’ll be the thundering sound of thousands of Zulu assegai (stabbing spears) slamming down on cowhide shields. “The haughty foe surrounding.” The British had rifles, of course, but they were outnumbered by about 25 to one. “Britain scorns to yield!” And yet they vanquished the enemy – killing hundreds of Zulus and forcing them, eventually, to abandon the attack.
In a way, it’s extraordinary that this exciting story was filmed as late as the Sixties. But as with every great myth, the truth was stretched – and stretched again. The Battle of Rorke’s Drift was, in reality, little more than a footnote after a far more important (and far more gory) battle earlier in the day, 11 miles away at Isandlwana.
Zulu: 10 things you didn’t know about the film
22 Jan 2014
Michael Caine thought Zulu would mark ‘end’ of his career
03 Nov 2009
The battle to restore Henry Hook’s honour
15 Aug 2008
There, on January 22 1879, a large British force was surprised, overwhelmed, killed and mutilated by about 20,000 Zulus. It was the ultimate humiliation for the British Empire. Why? Because for decades, its forces had been used to easy victories over badly equipped native armies. Spears and clubs, commanders thought, were no match for European massed firepower and strict discipline.
I hardly need to mention imperial theories about racial superiority. But perhaps they were what led the hubristic Lord Chelmsford, the commander-in-chief during the Anglo-Zulu War, to take half of his soldiers away from Isandlwana to hunt for the Zulu enemy.
In his absence, as the opening shots of Zulu reveal, the other half didn’t survive. The Zulu king, Cetshwayo, had ordered his men: “March slowly, attack at dawn and eat up the red soldiers.” That’s roughly what they did and nearly repeated at Rorke’s Drift.
A few months later, a British war correspondent, Archibald Forbes, visited the site of the massacre at Isandlwana. This is what he saw: “Some [of the dead men] were almost wholly dismembered, heaps of yellow clammy bones. I forbear to describe the faces, with their blackened features and beards bleached by rain and sun. Every man had been disembowelled. Some were scalped. And others had been subject to even ghastlier mutilations. The clothes had lasted better than the poor bodies they covered, and helped keep the skeletons together.”
Forgive the horrendous detail, but this is why serious historians doubt the popular narrative about Rorke’s Drift – the one expounded in Zulu. As Prof John Laband, who has written a book on the two actions, puts it, the battle provided the British authorities with “much-needed propaganda to counter the Zulu success at Isandlwana”. He argues, instead, that the battle “merely diverted a large Zulu raiding party from going about its short-term business”.
So there’s another reading of those 11 Victoria Crosses. Were they really about bravery, or about drawing attention away from one of the worst British defeats of the 19th century?
Sir Garnet Wolseley, the man who succeeded Lord Chelmsford as commander-in-chief, certainly had his doubts. “It is monstrous,” he said, “making heroes of those who, shut up in buildings at Rorke’s Drift, could not bolt, and fought like rats for their lives which they could not otherwise save.”
It may be monstrous, but it certainly makes for good cinema. And we mustn’t let history get in the way of a good myth with po-faced academic studies. You only need to watch Zulu Dawn, the 1979 prequel about Isandlwana, to appreciate that. The film’s cast is stellar – it includes Peter O’Toole, Burt Lancaster and John Mills – but the historically accurate result is dreary. Who wants to watch a painful British defeat unfold over two agonising hours? Not many people, apparently. It was a box-office flop. (The only stirring moment is when Lieutenants Melvill and Coghill die trying to save their regiment’s Colours – another two VCs, by the way.)
Zulu, by contrast, embraced the Victorian myth about Rorke’s Drift and gave it a new, blockbuster reinterpretation. Take Henry Hook, a leading character played by James Booth , who is a drunken malingerer in the film, confined to the hospital. “Hookie” redeems himself by saving the lives of the patients there and, in doing so, earns a VC.
The real Hook, however, was a teetotal Methodist and a model soldier. He was even awarded good conduct pay shortly before the battle, and his elderly daughter walked out of the film premiere in disgust at his portrayal.
The American director, Cy Endfield, was probably responsible for such artistic licence. He had been blacklisted in the US as a “Communist” in the early Fifties. So he came to work in Britain and – having chanced upon an article about Rorke’s Drift – relished the idea of turning it into an epic film. His friend Stanley Baker, who plays Lieutenant John Chard in the film, was happy to join the venture.
But the film didn’t come from these two men alone: Zulu is very much of its time. Thematically, you could say it’s roughly a Western, only with British soldiers for cowboys and Zulus for Indians. Baker and Endfield acknowledged as much: because many of the 700 Zulus hired as extras for the film had never been to a cinema before, the two men set up a projector in order for them to watch a Western starring Gene Autry. After that, the Zulus understood their precise role – to make lots of noise and fall over when shot. (They were reportedly paid for their work in cattle.)
Baker and Endfield could just as easily have put on 55 Days at Peking, which was released in 1963 and dramatises the siege of the foreign legations’ compounds in Peking during the Boxer Rebellion. Or The Alamo (1960), with its siege and gripping finale. Khartoum, another imperial era epic, was released a couple of years later in 1966.
Zulu, however, is a superior film to them all – which is why so many of us watch it every Christmas at home. Indeed, its extraordinary impact was highlighted this week by a museum curator, Bill Cainan, in Brecon. There, at the regimental museum of the Royal Welsh, the mementos of the battle are on display, including 10 of the 11 Victoria Crosses won at Rorke’s Drift. Mr Cainan is trying to prevent the museum’s closure.
He says: “Zulu is both a blessing and a curse. If it wasn’t for the film, it would be another forgotten foreign war.” But, he admits: “It’s a curse because most people seem to think it’s a documentary, which of course it isn’t.”
Thank goodness for that. Zulu is a story of real-life heroism seen through the lenses of Victorian propaganda and Hollywood epic cinema. It may not be truthful – but, my God, the result is thrilling.
READ: Inchon: the story of the worst war movie ever made
Start your free 30 day Amazon Prime trial»
Culture News »
Personal View »
Film news »
Joker to appear in Batman v Superman?
The best movies to watch
Superhero movies through the years
The Oscar winners
Oscars 2015 ceremony
Oscars 2015 red carpet
Clint Eastwood: 60 years in film
30 great closing lines in films
Robin Williams: 50 great quotes
Jennifer Lawrence in pictures
The 49 best British films of all time
Who gained or lost weight for films?
Oscars 2016 highlights
Chris Rock’s funniest Oscars jokes
Come Dine with Me producer wins Oscar
Leo attends the Oscars after-party
Lady Gaga sings with sexual abuse survivors
Oscars 2016: Red carpet highlights
More from The Telegraph
More from the web
LISTS AND QUOTES
80 great quotes about love and romance
In Pictures – the story of love and romance: from Adam and Eve to
Tinder and Chemsex. Compiled by Martin Chilton
Great quotes about acting
50 great quotes about acting
Who are the 50 best TV cops of all time?
We countdown the best TV detectives and sleuths, from Maigret and McNulty to
30 great opening lines in literature
30 great one-liners
More from The Telegraph
The latest news, opinion and analysis
Catch up on all the latest football news and results
All the latest film trailers, reviews and features
Enter one of our exciting new competitions
Back to top
- Film Reviews
- Film News
- Book Reviews
- Book Shop
- Music Reviews
- Classical Music
- Music Video
- Music Festivals
- TV and Radio
- TV Guide
- Theatre Reviews
- Culture News
- Picture Galleries
- Culture Video
- Culture Critics
- Theatre Tickets
- Contact us
- Privacy and Cookies
- Fantasy Football
- Reader Prints
- Follow Us
© Copyright of Telegraph Media Group Limited 2018
Terms and Conditions